At-will employment is a doctrine of American law The law of the United States consists of many levels of codified and uncodified forms of law, of which the most important is the United States Constitution, the foundation of the federal government of the United States. The Constitution sets out the boundaries of federal law, which consists of constitutional acts of Congress, constitutional that defines an employment Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. An employee may be defined as: "A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how relationship in which either party can break the relationship with no liability, provided there was no express contract In law, a contract is an agreement between two or more parties which, if it contains the elements of a valid legal agreement, is enforceable by law or by binding arbitration. A legally enforceable contract is an exchange of promises with specific legal remedies for breach. These can include compensatory remedy, whereby the defaulting party is for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer does not belong to a collective bargain (i.e., has not recognized a union A trade union or labor union (American English) is an organization of workers who have banded together to achieve common goals such as better working conditions. The trade union, through its leadership, bargains with the employer on behalf of union members (rank and file members) and negotiates labor contracts (collective bargaining) with). Under this legal doctrine:

any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work.[1]

Several exceptions to the doctrine exist, especially if unlawful discrimination CERD · CEDAW · CDE · ILO C111 · ILO C100 · ILO C169 · Protocol No. 12 ECHR is involved regarding the termination of an employee.

As a means of downsizing Layoff is the temporary suspension or permanent termination of employment of an employee or a group of employees for business reasons, such as the decision that certain positions are no longer necessary or a business slow-down or interruption in work. Originally the term "layoff" referred exclusively to a temporary interruption in work,, such as closing an unprofitable factory, a company may terminate employees en masse. However, there are legal limitations upon the employer's ability to terminate without reason.[2]

Contents

Origins

The at-will rule has its genesis in a rule in Horace Gray Wood’s 1877 treatise on master-servant relations. Wood cited four U.S. cases as authority for his rule that when a hiring was indefinite, the burden of proof was on the servant to prove that an indefinite employment term was for one year.[3] In Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, the Court noted that "Wood’s rule was quickly cited as authority for another proposition."[4]

Some courts saw the rule as requiring the employee to prove an express contract for a definite term in order to maintain an action based on termination of the employment.[5] Thus was born the U.S. at-will employment rule, which allowed discharge for no reason. This rule was adopted by all U.S. states A U.S. state is any one of 50 federated states of the United States of America that share sovereignty with the federal government. Because of this shared sovereignty, an American is a citizen both of the federal entity and of his or her state of domicile. Four states use the official title of commonwealth rather than state. State citizenship is. It was not until 1959 that the first judicial exception to the at-will rule was created.[6]

Since then, several common law Common law is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals , rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A "common law system" is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law, on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently on different and statutory Statutory law or statute law is written law set down by a legislature (as opposed to regulatory law promulgated by the executive branch or common law of the judiciary) exceptions to at-will employment have been created. Common-law protects one's job if an employee disobeys an employer on the grounds that the employer ordered him or her to do something illegal or immoral. However, in the majority of cases, the burden of proof remains upon the discharged employee. No U.S. state but Montana has chosen to statutorily modify the employment at-will rule.[7] In 1987, the Montana legislature passed the Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA). The Montana Act is unique in that, although it purports to preserve the at-will concept in employment law, it also expressly enumerates the legal bases for a wrongful discharge action.[8] Under the WDEA, a discharge is wrongful only if: "it was in retaliation for the employee's refusal to violate public policy or for reporting a violation of public policy; the discharge was not for good cause and the employee had completed the employer's probationary period of employment; or the employer violated the express provisions of its own written personnel policy."[9]

Public policy exceptions

U.S. states with a public policy exception

Under the public policy Public policy can be generally defined as the course of action or inaction taken by governmental entities with regard to a particular issue or set of issues. Other scholars define it as a system of "courses of action, regulatory measures, laws, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by a governmental entity or its exception, an employer Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. An employee may be defined as: "A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how may not fire an employee Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. An employee may be defined as: "A person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, where the employer has the power or right to control and direct the employee in the material details of how if it would violate the state's public policy doctrine Public policy is the body of principles that underpin the operation of legal systems in each state. This addresses the social, moral and economic values that tie a society together: values that vary in different cultures and change over time. Law regulates behaviour either to reinforce existing social expectations or to encourage constructive or a state or federal statute.

This includes retaliating against an employee for performing an action that complies with public policy (such as informing the authorities of an illegal activity, such as nursing home abuse[10]), as well as refusing to perform an action that would violate public policy.

Specific states

As of October 2000,[11] forty-three U.S. states and the District of Columbia Washington, D.C. , formally the District of Columbia and commonly referred to as Washington, the District, or simply D.C., is the capital of the United States, founded on July 16, 1790. The City of Washington was originally a separate municipality within the Territory of Columbia until an act of Congress in 1871 effectively merged the City and the recognize public policy as an exception to the at-will rule.[12]

The 7 states which do not have the exception are:

Implied contract exceptions

See also: Implied in fact contract An implied-in-fact contract is a contract agreed by non-verbal conduct, rather than by explicit words. As defined by the United States Supreme Court, it is "an agreement 'implied in fact'" as "founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties U.S. states with an implied-contract exception

Thirty-seven U.S. states (and the District of Columbia) also recognize an implied contract as an exception to at-will employment.[11] Under the implied contract exception, an employer may not fire an employee "when an implied contract is formed between an employer and employee, even though no express, written instrument regarding the employment relationship exists."[11] Proving the terms of an implied contract is often difficult, and the burden of proof is on the fired employee. Implied employment contracts are most often found when an employer's personnel policies or handbooks indicate that an employee will not be fired except for good cause or specify a process for firing. If the employer fires the employee in violation of an implied employment contract, the employer may be found liable for breach of contract.

37 US states have an implied-contract exception, thus 13 do not. Those 13 states are:

The implied-contract theory to circumvent at will employment must be treated with caution. In 2006, the Texas Court of Civil Appeals in Matagorda County Hospital District, Petitioner v Christine Burwell, Respondent,[14] held that a provision in an employee handbook stating that dismissal may be for cause, and requiring employee records to specify the reason for termination, did not modify an employee's at-will employment. The New York Court of Appeals, that state’s highest Court, also rejected the implied-contract theory to circumvent employment at will. In Anthony Lobosco, Appellant v New York Telephone Company/NYNEX, Respondent,[15] the court restated the prevailing rule that an employee could not maintain an action for wrongful discharge where state law recognized neither the tort of wrongful discharge, nor exceptions for firings that violate public policy, and an employee's explicit employee handbook disclaimer preserved the at-will employment relationship.

Covenant of good faith and fair dealing exceptions (aka. "Implied-in-law" Contracts)

See also: Quasi-contract A quasi-contract' is a legal substitute for a contract. A quasi-contract is a contract that should have been formed, even though in actuality it was not. It is used when a court wishes to create an obligation upon a non-contracting party to avoid injustice and to ensure fairness. It is invoked in circumstances of unjust enrichment U.S. states with a covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing exception

Only eleven U.S. states have recognized a breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as an exception to at-will employment.[11][16] These 11 states are:

This exception for a covenant of good faith and fair dealing represents the most significant departure from the traditional employment-at-will doctrine. Rather than narrowly prohibiting terminations based on public policy or an implied contract, this exception – at its broadest – reads a covenant of good faith and fair dealing into every employment relationship. It has been interpreted, by some courts, to mean either that employer personnel decisions are subject to a “just cause” standard or that terminations made in bad faith or motivated by malice are prohibited.

Statutory exceptions

Although all U.S. states have a number of statutory protections for employees, most wrongful termination Wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is an idiom and legal phrase, describing a situation in which an employee's contract of employment has been terminated by the employer in circumstances where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision in employment law suits brought under statutory causes of action use the federal anti-discrimination statutes which prohibit firing or refusing to hire an employee because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap status. Other reasons an employer may not use to fire an at-will employee are:

Examples of federal statutes include:

See also

Notes

This article incorporates public domain material from the United States Government document "The employment-at-will doctrine: three major exceptions" by Charles J. Muhl, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (retrieved on 6 February 2010).

  1. ^ Mark A. Rothstein, Andria S. Knapp & Lance Liebman, Cases and Materials on Employment Law (New York: Foundation Press, 1987), 738.
  2. ^ Lipsig, Ethan; Mary C. Dollarhide (1996). Downsizing: Law and Practice. Washington, DC: BNA Books. pp. 14–35. ISBN 1570180075.
  3. ^ Id. at 601, 292 N.W.2d at 886.
  4. ^ Id.
  5. ^ Id. at 603, 292 N.W.2d at 887.
  6. ^ Petermann v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of Am., Local 396, 174 Cal. App. 2d 184, 344 P.2d 25 (1959)
  7. ^ Robinson, Donald C., "The First Decade of Judicial Interpretation of the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA)", 57 Mont. L. Rev. 375, 376 (1996).
  8. ^ Id.
  9. ^ Mont. Code. Ann. § 39-2-904 (2008)
  10. ^ "Wrongful Discharge - An Exception to the At-Will Employment Doctrine". http://www.employee-advocates.com/PracticeAreas/Employment-Doctrine.asp. Retrieved May 24, 2010.
  11. ^ a b c d Muhl, Charles (January 2001). "The employment-at-will doctrine: three major exceptions" (PDF). Monthly Labor Review. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/01/art1full.pdf. Retrieved 2006-03-20.
  12. ^ In Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., 597 A.2d 28 (D.C. App. 1991), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals carved out a narrow public policy exception to the at-will employment doctrine. The appellate court held that the exception is "when the sole reason for the discharge is the employee's refusal to violate the law, as expressed in a statute or municipal regulation." 597 A.2d 28, 32. In 1997, this exception was expanded in Carl v. Children's Hospital, 702 A.2d 159 (D.C. App. 1997). The court held that, in addition to the exception articulated in Adams, wrongful discharge would also include a violation of public policy if the public policy is "solidly based on a statute or regulation that reflects the particular public policy to be applied, or (if appropriate) on a constitutional provision concretely applicable to the defendant's conduct." 702 A.2d 159, 163.
  13. ^ http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=Ch0448/SEC102.HTM&Title=-%3E2009-%3ECh0448-%3ESection%20102#0448.102
  14. ^ 49 Tex Sup J 370, 2006 Tex LEXIS 137
  15. ^ 751 N.E.2d 462 (2001)
  16. ^ It is unclear whether courts in the District of Columbia recognize a good-faith covenant exception. In Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc., 705 A.2d 624 (D.C. App. 1997), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against the plaintiff, who alleged that his employer had violated a "covenant of good faith and fair dealing" in conducting sexual harassment investigation against him. It is unclear if the Court of Appeals recognized the good-faith covenant but that the plaintiff did not prove a violation of the covenant, or whether the court did not recognized the good-faith covenant exception at all.
  17. ^ "Federal and State Statutory Exemptions to At-Will Employment". Managerial Law 1 (43): 92–98. 2001. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=0&did=278685321&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=6&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1195361334&clientId=13929. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
  18. ^ US: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "Retaliation". http://eeoc.gov/types/retaliation.html. Retrieved 04-10-2009.
  19. ^ US: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "Vanguard Group to Pay $500,000 for Retaliation". http://www.eeoc.gov/press/2-29-08a.html. Retrieved 2009-04-18.

References

Employment
Classifications Casual/ContingentFull-timePart-timeSelf-employed/Independent contractorTemporaryWage labour
Hiring Employment counsellorApplicationBackground CheckCover letterDrug testingContractInterviewJob huntingJob fraudProbationReferralRecruiter (Employment agencyExecutive search) • Résumé/Curriculum Vitæ (CV) • Work-at-home schemeSelection criteria
Roles InternshipJobNumeraryPermanentPermatempSupernumerarySupervisorVolunteer
Attendance BreakCareer breakFurloughGap yearLeave of absenceLong service leaveNo call, no showSabbaticalSick leave
Schedules 35-hour workweekEight-hour dayFlextime planFour-day weekOvertimeRetroactive overtimeShift workTelecommutingWorkweekWorking time
Wages Living wageMaximum wageMinimum wage (Canada, USA) • Overtime ratePaid time offPerformance-related paySalarySalary capWorking poor
Benefits Annual leaveSick leaveParental leaveHealth insuranceLife insuranceDisability insuranceTake-home vehicle
Health & safety ErgonomicsIndustrial injuryOccupational diseaseOccupational health psychologySick building syndromeWork accident (Occupational fatality) • Workplace noiseWorkplace stressWorkplace wellnessWork-life balanceWorkers' compensation
Equality Affirmative actionEqual pay for women
Infractions Employee handbookEvaluationLabour law • Sexual harassment • Sleeping while on dutyWorkplace bullyingWorkplace surveillance
Willingness Anti-workJob satisfactionRefusal of workWorkaholicWork aversionWork ethicWage slavery
Termination At-will employmentConstructive dismissalFiringLayoffLetter of resignationResignationRetirementSeverance packageTypes of unemploymentUnemploymentUnemployment benefitsWrongful dismissal
Miscellaneous Dead end jobOverqualificationRecession-proof jobUnderemploymentUnemployment rates

Categories: Employment law terms | Labor law of the United States | Human resource management | Ethically disputed business practices

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Mon Jul 19 19:27:08 2010. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


The Disaster of Government-Run Businesses - Prison Planet.com
prisonplanet.com
The Disaster of Government-Run Businesses - Prison Planet.com
Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:16:31 GMT+00:00
Prison Planet.com ... woman between the ages of 18 and 40 years could change his or her occupation at will . Every such change had to be registered at the Employment Exchange, ...
Google News Search: At-will employment,
Sat Jul 24 07:45:03 2010
Court jpg
tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com
Court jpg
278px x 385px | 64.40kB

[source page]

Florida Appellate Court Reverses Injunction in Non Compete Case Under Florida law where an employment contract expires by its terms and the parties continue to perform as before an implication arises that they have mutually assented to a new contract

Yahoo Images Search: At-will employment,
Sat Jul 24 07:44:46 2010
Does " At Will " Status Cover Demotions, Salary Decreases and Bonus ...
californiaemploymentattorneyblog.com
Does " At Will " Status Cover Demotions, Salary Decreases and Bonus ...

Michelman & Robinson LLP

Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:42:46 GM

". At will. " . employment. benefits both an employer and an employee by allowing either party to terminate the relationship at any time. Although it is long established that ". at will. " . employment. covers termination, does it also envelope ...

Google Blogs Search: At-will employment,
Tue Jul 27 02:38:28 2010
Does employment at will contradict union protection?
Q. Under employment at will, you can be fired for any reason, without notice. However, in my understanding, part of having union protection is having to have a valid reason for dismissal. So can how can, or can, employment at will apply to a union employee?
Asked by benvanzile - Mon May 14 10:39:49 2007 - - 5 Answers - 2 Comments

A. The negotiated contract has precedence over state "at will" laws, but it doesn't mean that workers have to continue on the job either. I'm speaking from a Skilled Trade Union perspective. Workers have the protection of a larger voice advocating their rights under Employment Laws, OSHA standards, etc. The contract also protects the employer. Almost all of the time the contract will state the number of workers to be dispatched out to the job. If, for some reason, the contractor releases one of the workers (or the worker drags up) the Hall dispatches another person. There are so many fine details about negotiating a contract and the regulations. If you are considering hiring Union Contract Labor, consult an attorney. Talk to the Business… [cont.]
Answered by beth - Mon May 14 12:21:44 2007

Yahoo Answers Search: At-will employment,
Sat Jul 24 07:44:08 2010